Yes, I have the coils out already.
Was just "touching base" about the entire casting.

I have a couple "pens" in the multi-hundred watt range.
Some thick solder wick, and there they were.
 =]

Chris
Kb0wlf

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Repeater-
> buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of de W5DK
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 2:11 PM
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Exec II receiver fiddling WAS:MastrII
> Receiver Failure
> 
> Yes, be careful not to strip any screws when you try to get the
> back/bottom
> open. He was saying it takes allot of heat to get the helical coil
> unsoldered from the side of the casting (once you have it open you will
> see). I have used a propane torch setting stationary on a bench while
> holding the casting in one hand and a pair of needle nose in the other,
> I
> hold that joint in the heat till it flows or till I had to put on a
> glove or
> drop the casting hihi.
> 
> Don Kirchner W5DK
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Curtis
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 1:42 PM
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Exec II receiver fiddling WAS:MastrII
> Receiver Failure
> 
> On my exec II receiver, the "casting" is just screwed together.
> Correct?
> 
> Chris
> Kb0wlf
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Repeater-
> > buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff DePolo
> > Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 9:00 PM
> > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] MastrII Receiver Failure
> >
> >
> > Chuck's got you going down the right path.  At 51 MHz, you probably
> > only
> > have to take one turn off of each of the first two coils.  At 52 MHz
> or
> > higher, you might have to take off two.  You need a lot of heat to
> get
> > the
> > casting open (hint: a soldering gun, even a 300 watt Weller, ain't
> > gonna cut
> > it).  Removing the coils/caps once you have the casting apart is
> pretty
> > straightfoward, as is removing one turn from each.  It's not that bad
> > of a
> > job once you've done one or two, but the first one may cause you some
> > grief.
> > You should find that after the mods the receiver is plenty hot and
> > should
> > easily beat spec by a few dB.  The LO/multiplier stages don't require
> > any
> > mods.
> >
> > If you want to cut corners, you might first see what your effective
> > sensitivity is at your repeater site on 6m.  You may find that the
> > noise
> > floor is elevated substantially, and that getting the "bench"
> > sensitivity
> > down from 1 uV to 0.3 uV isn't going to make a damned bit of
> difference
> > in
> > the real world.
> >
> >                                             --- Jeff
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> > > [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Curtis
> > > Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 4:16 PM
> > > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] MastrII Receiver Failure
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > You are correct sir, no mesh.
> > > Isn't that that pits.
> > >
> > > So I take it I'll be removing some windings from the underside of
> > said
> > > trimmer caps?
> > > Or is there an easier route to sensitivity?
> > > =]
> > >
> > > Chris,
> > > Kb0wlf
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> > > <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>  [mailto:Repeater-
> > > > buil...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > ] On Behalf Of Chuck Kelsey
> > > > Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 12:09 PM
> > > > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> > > <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] MastrII Receiver Failure
> > > >
> > > > Do the two front end trimmer caps still have some "mesh"
> > > left, or are
> > > > they
> > > > at minimum capacitance? That may be your problem.
> > > >
> > > > Chuck
> > > > WB2EDV
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Chris Curtis" <demo...@rollanet.org
> > > <mailto:demoman%40rollanet.org> >
> > > > To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> > > <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com> >
> > > > Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 10:45 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] MastrII Receiver Failure
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I have a mastr EXEC II receiver (33 split) that I can't get
> > > sensitivity
> > > > to
> > > > increase.
> > > >
> > > > I replaced the fet as outlined below on the mastr II query.
> > > > No joy though.
> > > >
> > > > I'm using an am/fm-1200s to tune the receiver.
> > > >
> > > > .5~1uv is where the receiver is coming to life.
> > > >
> > > > I have a couple vhf and uhf exec II receivers that tuned up
> > > nicely in
> > > > the
> > > > .19~.2uv range so I "think" I'm doing/reading it correctly.
> > > >
> > > > Original freq was in the 46~49mHz range.
> > > > Current crystal (icom sent to and received from Bomar) on
> 51.75mHz.
> > > >
> > > > Any tips/hints/tricks to get a little more sensitivity?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the bandwidth!
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > > Kb0wlf
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > > Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.85/2193 - Release
> > > Date: 06/26/09 05:53:00
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.83/2191 - Release Date:
> > 06/26/09 05:53:00
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.83/2191 - Release Date:
> 06/29/09 05:54:00

Reply via email to