While I don't have any recordings for you, I can assure you that ALL 
machines I build have audio responses that sound as close to simplex as 
possible. When I am finished with a machine, I have a helper in another 
room talk into the repeater's input while I toggle my receiver between 
the receiver's input and output frequencies. If they don't sound REALLY 
close, the machine doesn't leave my shop.

There are many things that can lead to distortion in a repeater's audio 
path. Among these are discriminator response, PL filtering, (if used) 
controller bandwidth and distortion, and exciter frequency response. The 
most likely causes of audio response issues are the controller and 
exciter modulator.

Since you describe the audio response as either 'tinny' or 'muffled' 
that tells me that the audio input response of the controller is not 
configured properly. *Most* controllers can be used with both 
discriminator audio or de-emphasized audio. This is often jumper 
selectable, but sometimes component changes are necessary.

I will leave it to the reader to do further research on what these two 
type of audio are, but suffice to say that most controllers expect to 
see discriminator audio and have on-board de-emphasis circuitry to make 
the audio response "flat" again.

If the repeater in question has a 'boomy' sound to it, this is likely a 
sign of too much low-end audio response. The audio is more than likely 
being de-emphasized twice inside the system. The best and easiest way to 
fix this is to remove the extra de-emphasis circuitry. This can 
sometimes be done on the input circuitry of the controller. If it can't 
be done there, you may have to look at your Rx audio source.

It is common practice to those who don't know any better to use audio 
from the speaker. "It's convenient and it squelches when the repeater is 
not active." This is a BAD idea. Not only is the audio WAYYY to loud 
from a speaker's output, it's bound to the volume control. If someone is 
at the repeater site and decides he wants to listen in on a 
conversation, there goes the audio setting for the repeater!! Speaker 
audio is a good example of de-emphasized audio.

If the repeater audio sounds 'tinny' it has too many high frequency 
components. In this case, an additional stage of de-emphasis is 
required. Again, the easiest way to add this is in the controller's 
audio circuitry.

If the audio is 'muffled', it is probably being processed (compressed) 
too hard. Inside a transmitter there is circuitry that keeps the audio 
tamed down and in check to avoid overmodulaton and other band things 
from happening. This circuitry can only do so much. If it is getting hit 
with an audio source that is WAYYY to loud, it simply slams it to the 
ground, hence making it sound bad.

This is an over-simplification, but more information on audio processing 
and how to *properly* set it up can be found in the repeater-builder.com 
site.:
http://www.repeater-builder.com/tech-info/audioprocessing.html
(This may be a bit over your head)[sorry Jeff]
http://www.repeater-builder.com/tech-info/fmtheorydiscussion.html

Sounded like a simple enough question didn't it!!

Enjoy,
Scott


Scott Zimmerman
Amateur Radio Call N3XCC
474 Barnett Road
Boswell, PA 15531


tait700 wrote:
> Hello,
> Was Wondering if anyone had a link to a site that had samples of talk thru 
> Repeater traffic that would be considered good quality audio ?
> Maybe i am expecting too much but any of the ones around here that i have 
> heard seem either Muffled or very Shrill, Listening on the input frequency 
> the Audio seems quite reasonable but the Transmit Audio doesn't sound the 
> same and seems a bit average.
> I realize that the Audio will vary due to the normal constraints of Radio 
> atmospherics but i was hoping for something that doesn't sound like a very 
> cheap tiny AM broadcast radio
> I would be really interested in discovering just how good normal Analogue 
> speech can sound when it is being passed through something that is properly 
> setup.
> Apologies if this has been answered before, i searched but couldn't find 
> anything specific.
> Any info gratefully received,
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.2/2214 - Release Date: 07/02/09 
> 05:54:00
> 

Reply via email to