Keep in mind that he believes repeater operation in 52-54 MHz will cause 
him interference. I already suggested the 50.800-51.000 MHz RC band.

I have also mentioned that repeaters have been operating on the 52-54 
MHz band for decades, coexisting with RC operations. I suggested that he 
has likely coped with signals on 53.490 and 53.510 MHz many times - only 
10 kHz away.

So, I asked him for any evidence that repeaters within 30 kHz cannot 
coexist with RC operations.

Joe M.

John D. Lewis, NF3Q wrote:
> Don't forget the FCC rules...in this case, I am only to assume (knowing 
> MCH's identity) that this is taking place in Western Pennsylvania.  That 
> being said, my question is, if the repeater is coordinated by a 
> governing body (WPRC) why would he/she complain about RC operations?  
> The FCC rules, as far as I see them and have read, grant governing 
> authority to the regional coordinating body to authorize said band plans 
> per region.  The operator of the RC equipment needs to yield way to the 
> authorizing entity.  Logical thinking, regardless of rules, would 
> dictate that amateurs be good stewards of the frequencies they occupy 
> and utilize appropriate 'channels' that do not interfere with other 
> equipment.  I would concur with 'DCFluX' in terms of getting crystals 
> reground for a mere $50 (let's say) versus a repeater operator 
> re-pairing, recalibrating, and retuning the entire repeater station.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> John, NF3Q
> 
> MCH wrote:
>>  
>>
>> Does anyone have any experience with repeater operation vs RC operation
>> (Remote Control)? I have an RC operator who is 'raising a stink' about a
>> repeater that is 30 kHz away from one of his RC channels.
>>
>> BTW, he also wants to 'compromise' by offering to relocate the repeater
>> off the 52-54 MHz segment so they will not impact his RC operations.
>> Some compromise, huh?
>>
>> I think he has the impression that RC channels are 100 kHz wide (they
>> are standard AM) because the 6M RC channels are spaced at 100 kHz
>> (53.100, 53.200, 53.3500, 53.400, Etc).
>>
>> I've told him they cannot be more than 10 kHz wide, if that, and that
>> the FC repeater would be only 16 kHz wide, and at 30 kHz away the two
>> can coexist without interference.
>>
>> Oh, the repeater in question is at least 20 miles away from his flying 
>> site.
>>
>> Any input out there? Exactly how wide is his AM signal?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joe M.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.387 / Virus Database: 270.13.38/2274 - Release Date: 07/31/09 
> 05:58:00
> 

Reply via email to