Of course, if there is on COS provided, then VOX has to be used. But my question specifically referenced someone using Echolink, which provides COS!!
------ Original Message ------ Received: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:02:15 PM PDT From: "skipp025" <skipp...@yahoo.com> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Delay > > > "JOHN MACKEY" <jmac...@...> wrote: > > Then why not do all that using the COS provided? > > What if there is no provided COS..? Just an audio > source... > > s. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > Received: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:53:51 PM PDT > > From: "skipp025" <skipp...@...> > > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Delay > > > > > > > > > > > Step right up... welcome to the show... Can any of you > > > tell it's a Friday? > > > > > > > "JOHN MACKEY" <jmackey@> wrote: > > > > WHY would someone be using VOX in a system linked to > > > > a repeater (such as Echolink)? > > > > > > To delay the audio long enough for the vox circuit to > > > first detect and provide COS/COR/PTT logic. The first > > > portion of the inbound audio is not chopped off. > > > > > > s. > > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > > > Received: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:49:01 PM PDT > > > > From: "skipp025" <skipp025@> > > > > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > > > > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Delay > > > > SNIP > > > > > > Helping my echolink node not get confused about > > > > > > what it is supposed to listen to is my primary purpose > > > > > > for having the delay. > > > > > > > > > > Audio delay lines are killer (great) for use with VOX > > > > > (voice) operated logic... and a must have for many > > > > > simulcast transmission packages. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
