What is the difference between real and un-real RG214? And what is the problem with RG-142?
lh On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:24 PM, NORM KNAPP <nkn...@twowayradio.net> wrote: > > > Those are usually the preferred types of cables. You should have no > problems with either of those. I prefer REAL RG214/U., but RG400/U, RG393 or > RG223/U will work. Avoid RG-142 and RG-9/U. Superflex is also a good choice. > Don't even think about any LMR type or > similar. > N5NPO Norm > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com<Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>< > Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com <Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>> > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com <Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>< > Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com <Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>> > Sent: Sun Mar 07 16:54:30 2010 > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable > > > > Any problems with RG-214 or RG223 for duplexers/multi-couplers/combiners? > > lh > > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Dan Saputo > <dan17...@yahoo.com<dan173mi%40yahoo.com><mailto: > dan17...@yahoo.com <dan173mi%40yahoo.com>> > wrote: > > > > > well-documented and caused mainly by the use of foil shielding as in the > lmr series. gets worse as cable ages and internal braid-foil contact > degrades. Although not as big of a problem with lmr due to an insulating > layer over the actual foil. beware of belden 9913 and lmr look-alikes. > trouble when used duplex. > > Dan > k8plw > > --- On Sun, 3/7/10, Chuck Kelsey > <wb2...@roadrunner.com<wb2edv%40roadrunner.com><mailto: > wb2...@roadrunner.com <wb2edv%40roadrunner.com>> > wrote: > > > > From: Chuck Kelsey <wb2...@roadrunner.com <wb2edv%40roadrunner.com><mailto: > wb2...@roadrunner.com <wb2edv%40roadrunner.com>> > > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > <Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com><mailto: > Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com <Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>> > Date: Sunday, March 7, 2010, 4:56 PM > > > > Passive Intermod. In other words, it tends to be a source in which intermod > > can be generated easily. > > Chuck > WB2EDV > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "rffun" <radio...@her. forthnet. gr < > http://us.mc560.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=radiocom%40her.forthnet.gr> > > > To: <Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com < > http://us.mc560.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com> > > > Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:33 PM > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable > > > <LMR and similar cables are not rated for low PIM> > > What exactly do you mean by PIM ? > > rffun > > > > --- In Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com < > http://us.mc560.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com> > , Larry Horlick <llhorl...@. ..> > > wrote: > >> > >> Indeed. I'll read the archives. Thanks. > >> > >> 73 > >> > >> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Chuck Kelsey <wb2...@...> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > The subject comes up on this list about every other week. I can only > >> > assume > >> > you are new. > >> > > >> > LMR and similar cables are not rated for low PIM, a fact verified by > >> > the > >> > manufacturer. > >> > > >> > Chuck > >> > WB2EDV > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > *From:* Larry Horlick <llhorl...@. ..> > >> > *To:* Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com < > http://us.mc560.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com> > > >> > *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2010 8:49 PM > >> > *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor Stock Power Supplies > >> > > >> > I've never heard of it. As an installer, I'm always under pressure to > >> > use > >> > less expensive feedlines than the venerable Heliax, and I had often > >> > considered LMR, but never actually succumbed to the temptation. This > is > >> > interesting information. Is this a well documented phenomenon? > >> > > >> > Anyone else like to chime in on this... > >> > > >> > Larry > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2728 - Release Date: 03/07/10 > 02:34:00 > > > > > > > > > >
