arggh: after digging, here's the link to the actual NOV: http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296584A1.html
> > So, what's to stop someone from saying they programmed a freq for > emergency use only? Why else have the exception, unless you are expected to > have an "unauthorized" frequency programed in your radio? > > So, the exception (90.417) clearly makes 90.427 un-enforceable UNLESS you > can prove intent to operate on the "unauthorized" frequency for NON-emergency > communications. The school was operating on the frequency, but they don't say > what kind of communication was involved. > > --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, wd8chl<wd8...@...> wrote: > > > > In February, a large two-way radio dealer was issued a Notice Of > > Violation (NOV) by the FCC for adding a frequency into radios that the > > customer was not licensed for. The Notice stated that Section 90.427(b) > > prohibits programming into a transmitter frequencies the licensee using > > the transmitter is not authorized for. > > > > Make sure your customers are licensed for the frequencies you put in > > radios you sell! > > > > Information from Mission Critical Magazine, May 2010. FCC enforcement > > case NOV 201032900008. > > --------------------- > > Jim Barbour > > Transcore > > > > > >
