Care to hazard a guess on the percentage of facilities (radio/tv, two-way) 
that aren't done right?

A few years ago this happened near here - a radio personality wearing 
headphones taken to the hospital following a lightning strike to the tower 
outside the radio station.

Chuck
WB2EDV


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric Lemmon" <wb6...@verizon.net>
To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 11:42 AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT- Dispatcher injured by lightning strike


> Whenever I read a report like this, I have mixed emotions.  I am surprised
> that the injury occurred, which is impossible if the facility was properly
> designed and islanded in accordance with numerous standards, including 
> NFPA
> 70, NFPA 780, and the Motorola R56 Manual.  I am also angry that an 
> official
> issued the statement that "...the communications system, including its
> 400-foot radio tower, are grounded in accordance with industry safety
> standards."  That official, and the idiots who designed the communications
> center, should be fired and/or brought up on criminal charges.
>
> The key to a safe installation at a location with an on-site tower is to
> ensure that all utilities pass through a "window" where a common ground
> reference exists.  Ideally, the tower should be right next to the 
> facility,
> so that the same ground reference is used for both.  The power transformer
> that feeds the control room should be in that room, not hundreds of feet
> away, and the secondary neutral of that transformer should be bonded to 
> the
> same ground that is used by the telephones, radio system, cable TV,
> satellite system, and raised-floor supports.  If executed properly, the
> design of the control room creates a Faraday Cage within which all 
> occupants
> are safe from injury due to GPR (Ground Potential Rise) from a nearby
> lightning strike.  Likewise, all the electronics within the control room 
> are
> protected against surge damage.
>
> It is obvious from the news report that the dispatcher was injured because
> her headset was at a different potential from her body.  The GPR resulting
> from lightning striking the tower led to thousands of volts difference
> between the radio control system (the headset) and the floor and counter 
> in
> the control room- and the chair she was sitting in.  It is also obvious 
> that
> this difference in potential could not exist if the tower and the adjacent
> control room were grounded in accordance with industry safety standards.
> Some common sense and credible engineering skills are essential elements 
> in
> a proper control room design.
>
> Many moons ago (late 60's), I was Chief Engineer at radio station WLRW, a 
> 50
> kW FM station at Champaign-Urbana, Illinois.  During my watch, the station
> control room was relocated to a building next door.  It was my job to
> supervise the cabling installation within the building and to the
> transmitter at the base of the tower, which was just over 100 feet away.
> All of the remote circuits and network feeds came through a grounding 
> window
> that was common with the power and the tower grounding system.  I remember
> arguing with the Illinois Power foreman about how we needed a separate
> transformer to power the station, and it had to be installed right at the
> side of the control room and not in a vault several hundred feet away. 
> The
> value of designing the entire installation to comply with established
> industry standards and sound engineering practices was proven many times,
> when the tower was struck by lightning during a storm, and no damage or
> injury occurred.  Although the station was on automation most of the day, 
> we
> had live talent from late afternoon to early morning, and at least one
> lightning strike occurred while on-air talent was at the board and wearing
> headphones.  The lights blinked, but the board operator felt nothing and 
> the
> show went on.
>
> 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

Reply via email to