Thanks for the reply, Kevin. I'm looking forward to seeing the article.
73, Russ WB8ZCC
On 8/5/2010 1:20 PM, Kevin Custer wrote:
Russ Hines wrote:
Thanks, guys, a good topic and one that always seems to come up. And
it sparks more questions and comments, of course.
The cable length issue is a brother to "if you don't like your VSWR,
change the point along the transmission line where you're measuring
it." By changing the length of the line, we're creating a
transmission line transformer (a good thing) but we're limited by its
length (not so good). It seems to me the mentioned
circulator/isolator at the output of the xmtr is a better fix, as
reflections coming back from the duplexer is absorbed by the
circulator's load, the xmtr is generally happy, and we're no longer
limited where we can put things in a rack or elsewhere.
For amateurs, coming up with usable VHF circulators seems to be
difficult and usually expensive, and coax always seems to be
cheaper. Has anyone had luck finding a source for reasonbly priced
VHF circulators, or success in rolling their own?
Also, I noted in the pamphlet Kevin referenced that the unused
duplexer port was left open (Figs. 1 & 2). I guess if the isolation
is already greater than the load's return loss, it doesn't matter, at
least at the reject frequency. But it seems to me one could possibly
create problems for oneself by not terminating the unused open port.
Just a thought.
Maybe I work better knowing there's a load there. ;-)
Your comments, please.
73, Russ WB8ZCC
I think we all agree that a real impedance matching device is the best
approach, but hams (generally speaking) are cheap. Many will spend
two days hacking on a piece of RG-214 before spending fifty or a
hundred bucks on a different (better?) solution.
Allan Crites and I are currently in discussion which will be used as
the basis of a RB web article that will explain exactly what is
happening, why it happens, and why an 'optimized' cable length can be
used to transfer power ending up with the stated loss of the duplexer
and have little reflected power toward the transmitter - so long as
the duplexer is tuned properly and exhibits good return loss on the
frequency it's designed to pass.
Kevin Custer
