The same, perhaps not, but wouldn't intelligibility decrease as the quality degrades?
Joe M. nj902 wrote: > > --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, MCH <m...@...> wrote: > > "I would agree with the quality issues, but does that really equate to > unintelligibility on any significant scale?" > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Use of the term 'quality' is based on "Delivered Audio Quality" or "DAQ" > > DAQ is a communications industry metric which has a numeric scale defined > from the subjective evaluation of the intelligibility of transmissions. > > Thus, in this narrowbanding discussion context, use of the word "quality" > does mean the same as intelligibility. > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
