On Tue, Feb 08 2022, Craig Topham <cra...@fsf.org> wrote: > repo-criteria-discuss folks, > > I'm not familiar with the process. How can we move forward on > evaluating sourcehut, codeberg and notabug?
Sourcehut and Notabug were evaluated in 2021. Those evals were OK'd by RMS, and as far as I can tell are still accurate. I've just installed those. <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00053.html> Codeberg almost got there, but I couldn't find a conclusive grade or definitive OK in the list archives. -g -- Greg Farough // Campaigns Manager Free Software Foundation Join the FSF and help us defend software freedom: https://my.fsf.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
