On Thu, May 05 2022, Richard Stallman <r...@gnu.org> wrote: > What do people think of this? > > > I propose adding a new criterion B2-0: > > In particular, explains the importance of including a license notice > in all nontrivial source files, not just in a few places. > > While this is included in "unclear licensing" in B2, I fear it won't > be clear to people that those two words include this.
I think it makes sense to include as-is, but haven't put it on proposed-new-repo-criteria.html yet. I'll wait a day or two to see if anyone has other comments about it. -g -- Greg Farough // Campaigns Manager Free Software Foundation Join the FSF and help us defend software freedom: https://my.fsf.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
