On Thu, Apr 21 2022, Richard Stallman <r...@gnu.org> wrote: > [I requested this help on Feb 22, but I don't think it has been done] > > Would someone like to make an updated version of repo-criteria.html > with the changes we've agreed on, and call it > proposed-new-repo-criteria.html? The text should be changed to say > that these are the proposed changed repo criteria, and see > repo-criteria.html for our actual, current repo criteria. > > Posting this would enable us to get comments more > and work towards making this change.
I've made a proposed-new-repo-criteria.html page just now, and have posted it: <https://gnu.org/software/proposed-new-repo-criteria.html>. Here's a list of changes, which are also summarized near the top of that page: * Simplify C5 - based on <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-03/msg00056.html> * Add B1.0 - based on <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-04/msg00014.html> * Simplify A2 - based on <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-03/msg00056.html> * Add explanatory note to A+1 - based on <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-03/msg00059.html> * Add criterion A+6 - based on <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-04/msg00005.html> * Add criterion A+7 - based on <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-04/msg00014.html> That's all that I saw. One point worth mentioning is that in our discussions, we were talking about "B1.9." I assumed this was a typo and changed it to B1.0 when making this page, as B1 doesn't have any other subitems (and we have a C0.0). But if there's some reason for that numbering that I missed, I can fix it. -g -- Greg Farough // Campaigns Manager Free Software Foundation Join the FSF and help us defend software freedom: https://my.fsf.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature