On Mon, May 23 2022, Ian Kelling <i...@fsf.org> wrote: > Akib Azmain Turja <a...@disroot.org> writes: > >> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] >> Ian Kelling <i...@fsf.org> writes: >> >>> Wuzzy <wu...@disroot.org> writes: >>> >>>> Hello! I like to suggest adding reviews for https://codeberg.org and >>>> https://git.disroot.org, two instances of Gitea <https://gitea.io>. >>> >>> Good idea. Someone should do an evaluation and post it. It is just a >>> comment what they found with respect to each point in the criteria. >>> >> >> I use Codeberg and also have an account at Disroot's Gitea. Can someone >> tell me about the evaluation process? > > Here is the process as far as I know: > > First, anyone does the evaluation by going through all the points, and > documenting what they find. Then post it here. Also, at that point or > later, they should post a patch to the website that has the changes > based on their evaluation, or at least what the text should say. Then > people on the list review the evaluation, comment on it, it may need > changes, and when there are no more changes to make, someone with access > to update the site does it.
There was a partial evaluation of Codeberg sometime last year. A good place to start would be reviewing this thread from the list, and seeing if everything still applies. <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00000.html> -g -- Greg Farough // Campaigns Manager Free Software Foundation Join the FSF and help us defend software freedom: https://my.fsf.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature