On Mon 2022-05-23 10:24:17 -0400, Greg Farough wrote: > On Mon, May 23 2022, Ian Kelling <i...@fsf.org> wrote: > >> Akib Azmain Turja <a...@disroot.org> writes: >> >>> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] >>> Ian Kelling <i...@fsf.org> writes: >>> >>>> Wuzzy <wu...@disroot.org> writes: >>>> >>>>> Hello! I like to suggest adding reviews for https://codeberg.org and >>>>> https://git.disroot.org, two instances of Gitea <https://gitea.io>. >>>> >>>> Good idea. Someone should do an evaluation and post it. It is just a >>>> comment what they found with respect to each point in the criteria. >>>> >>> >>> I use Codeberg and also have an account at Disroot's Gitea. Can someone >>> tell me about the evaluation process? >> >> Here is the process as far as I know: >> >> First, anyone does the evaluation by going through all the points, and >> documenting what they find. Then post it here. Also, at that point or >> later, they should post a patch to the website that has the changes >> based on their evaluation, or at least what the text should say. Then >> people on the list review the evaluation, comment on it, it may need >> changes, and when there are no more changes to make, someone with access >> to update the site does it. > > There was a partial evaluation of Codeberg sometime last year. A good > place to start would be reviewing this thread from the list, and > seeing if everything still applies. > > <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00000.html> >
There's also <https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Codeberg> but this link is included in that thread too. > -g Best, Yuchen -- PGP Key: 47F9 D050 1E11 8879 9040 4941 2126 7E93 EF86 DFD0 <https://ypei.org/assets/ypei-pubkey.txt>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature