[snip] > With the changes to the URI syntax I'm proposing, using version 1.1 of > commons-dbcp > as an example, the license would be stored at: > http://repo.apache.org/apache/commons-dbcp/1.1/licenses/license.html > not: > http://repo.apache.org/apache/commons-dbcp/1.1/licenses/license-1.1.html >
In case of the majority of artifacts version name should be a part of artifact file name. I might agree that http://repo.apache.org/apache/commons-dbcp/1.1/licenses/license.html is acceptable but for a sake of consistency - we should rather use http://repo.apache.org/apache/commons-dbcp/1.1/licenses/license-1.1.html Note that artifacts like http://repo.apache.org/apache/commons-dbcp/1.1/licenses/license-1.1.html or http://repo.apache.org/apache/stsruts/1.1/tlds/struts-tiles.1.1.tld are almost always no important for humans. Michal
