Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/11/2003 07:23:15 PM:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Why don't we just focus on: > > > > a) getting an ASF-only repository up first, and > > b) Getting the management and tooling for that > > > > before taking on virtual hosting. > > > > I'm failing to see the requirement for us to do that *now*. > > Because Apache projects using the repository would need also non-asf > jars that we don't want to distribute -> virtual artifacts. And there are other places those jars can be found. I'm failing to see how this impacts a repo that stores ASF-only content. I agree it would be a nice to have, but is it a requirement for an ASF repo? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
