HI Tres The last thing I would love to be able to do would be to declare the permissions at the class level
as in (Allow, Owner, "edit") And have a Owner a special principal like Everyone, that allows me to declare the permission. But only evaluates "owner" when the permission is checked Do you think that could work, I haven't worked out how I could implement that though. T On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Tim Hoffman wrote: > >> I was hoping to declare the local role equivalent at the class level, >> but following from what you said >> >> I have a class declaration for "site_manager" and persist >> a user/owner declaration on the object at creation time ? >> >> Then when I retrieve the entity from the app engine datastore >> have a __acl__ property accessor which >> then merges the class declaration with the persisted addition >> definition of ower. >> >> Does that sound like an appropriate approach? > > That sounds like it would work, yes. > > > Tres. > - -- > =================================================================== > Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com > Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkt516wACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4I6ACfaqLKXOodUYv8GroTYAPN3TwL > izQAnA1Y6ojjgLB/LgpHpTFU08LoRI0h > =ruoG > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
