On 4/7/10 9:47 AM, Charlie Clark wrote: > Am 07.04.2010, 15:41 Uhr, schrieb Chris McDonough<chr...@plope.com>: > >>> I noticed in the 1.2 docs that view configuration in zcml uses the >>> 'context' predicate instead of the zope 'for' predicate. Just wanted to >>> know if I can still safely use 'for' or whether new code should switch >>> all those. > >> The "for" spelling will continue to work "forever". > > After Iain pointed this out I checked the book. "View" seems to relate to > a specific object class rather than interface and I can imagine is a > convenience for the very common case where interfaces have only a single > implementation. Is this assumption correct?
Yes. This is a general feature of zope.component; if you register an adapter using a class as the "for" (instead of an interface), the adapter will be found during lookup if the adapted object is an instance of that class. - C _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
