-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/05/2014 10:44 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> 
>> On 05 Nov 2014, at 15:57, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com>
>> wrote: Unicode literals are a no-no for 3.2-compatibility:
> 
> How important is 3.2 compatibility?

We don't ordinarily drop a supported Python version a non-major release.
 As a dependency for pyramid, if translationstring drops 3.2
compatiblity, we would need to pin it for "release" branches to versions
which preserved it.  Note that the classifiers for translationstring 1.2
still claim support back to 2.4:

  https://pypi.python.org/pypi/translationstring/1.2

although testing versions < 2.6 with tox is no longer feasible.



Tres.
- -- 
===================================================================
Tres Seaver          +1 540-429-0999          tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlRaVoYACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4P8gCgh+OCSzYo9/Apd/Ifz5lIiVWK
F0kAoMSHt4Vri2QjhpHNLCatJ+gFUnvf
=NKAB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
https://lists.repoze.org/mailman/listinfo/repoze-dev

Reply via email to