At 6:53 AM -0600 24/11/00, Don Foy wrote:
>I want
>everything perfect for a backup, since a less than perfect backup is
>absolutely useless. That one byte it missed and didn't tell me about may
>have been in the middle of a file that could cost me several thousands
>dollars.
I agree, but in that case I'd expect file transfers around my network
to be producing useless files since 1 byte lost will affect those
just as much as in a backup. My point is that this is simply not
happening.
If I can throw a 600+ Mb file from one machine to another, then IMO
Retrospect ought to be able to back it up without falling over.
>That's not a fault of Retrospect, but a feature, the way I see it.
Hmmm.
--
Ken G i l l e t t
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
--
----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.
