At 10:48 05.01.01 +1100, Michael Kennard wrote:
>Just a thought, when does it get time to copy to tape, this seems good in
>theory but I guess it could only be efficient if you can run multiple
>backup sessions in parallel.
Yep. The moment you interleave backups to holding disk and dumping
(finished) backups from there to tape, you gain.
>I'm not sure about the problem with speed, I think tape drives can keep up
>with network speeds though I can't tell you that for certain.
It's the other way 'round: High end tapes (DLT, AIT) are faster than the
filesystem/network combo.
hauke
--
Hauke Fath Tangro Software Components GmbH
D-69115 Heidelberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ruf +49-6221-13336-0, Fax -21
--
----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/>
For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.
