Nice, that makes much more sense. Guy
On Jul 25, 2014, at 2:28 PM, Christian Hammond <christ...@beanbaginc.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The login and password is just used the first time to fetch a token. We never > store those credentials. Instead, we pass them directly to the GitHub > Enterprise API and store the resulting token. That token will last until you > revoke it on GitHub Enterprise. > > We're working on a full redesign of the repository page for a future release, > which will make this more clear and cause a token to be fetched client-side, > causing the username/password to never even go through our APIs. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com > Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org > Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com > > On July 25, 2014 at 2:26:07 PM, Guy Gascoigne-Piggford > (guy.piggf...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> I've been evaluating the powerpack. Is there a way to have the GitHub >> Enterprise repository hosting to use token based authentication rather than >> a user and password? We enforce password aging (sadly) and I don't fancy >> having to fix the same duplicated account on every repo every 90 days. >> >> For that matter it would be nice to be able to share the authentication >> information and not have it duplicated at all. >> >> Guy >> >> On Saturday, July 12, 2014 5:16:37 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: >> The issue is the way they handle authentication and access control. It used >> to be that a raw URL worked fine, but due to changes made in their API, it's >> no longer useable. For the data we need, in a way that works reliably, we >> have to use their API. >> >> Christian >> >> -- >> Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com >> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >> Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com >> >> On July 12, 2014 at 5:11:23 PM, Guy Gascoigne-Piggford (guy.pi...@gmail.com) >> wrote: >> >>> is the issue the https part of the raw url mask? >>> >>> >>> On Saturday, July 12, 2014 4:55:20 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: >>> Git has no ability to fetch files remotely via the protocol, which is why >>> the raw URL mask is used. However, this is only useful for certain >>> services, and GitHub Enterprise is not one of them. >>> >>> We provide official support for GitHub Enterprise as part of Power Pack, >>> which also offers PDF document review and, soon, reporting functionality. >>> This is at https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/. >>> >>> You would need to set up a trial license or purchase a full license for >>> your server. Then, using GitHub Enterprise is as simple as adding a new >>> repository, choosing GitHub Enterprise as the hosting service, and >>> providing the details on which repository you want to add. >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> -- >>> Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com >>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >>> Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com >>> >>> On July 12, 2014 at 4:52:54 PM, Guy Gascoigne-Piggford >>> (guy.pi...@gmail.com) wrote: >>> >>>> We're beginning the switch over to a locally hosted Github Enterprise from >>>> bzr and I'm looking at configuring reviewboard to work with git. I've >>>> tried all sorts of permutations of the git repository settings but never >>>> get past a rather bland permission denied error. Is there any way to get >>>> more details about what's broken? >>>> >>>> Using reviewboard 1.7.25 >>>> >>>> I've enabled debug logging in admin UI, but all I ever see are lines like: >>>> >>>> 2014-07-12 23:30:38,023 - DEBUG - - GitTool: Attempting ssh connection >>>> with host: github.hostname.com, username: git >>>> >>>> with no further details, no idea as to whether this worked or failed. >>>> >>>> My repository configuration is: >>>> >>>> repository type: Git >>>> path: g...@github.hidden.com:ggp/testProject.git >>>> mirrorPath: <blank> >>>> raw file mask: >>>> https://github.hidden.com/ggp/testProject/raw/<revision>/<filename> >>>> username: <blank> >>>> password: <blank> >>>> >>>> I've tried innumerable permutations of this, most of them seeming to have >>>> zero effect. >>>> >>>> I have an ssh key installed, it appears to be correctly readable. It does >>>> match one that's installed in our github. >>>> >>>> The web server is running as user apache (on a Centos box), as apache I've >>>> been able to run: >>>> >>>> ssh -vT g...@github.hidden.com which is successful. >>>> >>>> and: >>>> >>>> DEBUG_RBSSH=1 rbssh g...@github.hidden.com >>>> >>>> Which I think is successful. It outputs an exception because the Channel >>>> is closed, but the rbssh*.log file says that authentication was successful. >>>> >>>> 07-12 16:44 paramiko.transport DEBUG userauth is OK >>>> 07-12 16:44 paramiko.transport INFO Authentication (publickey) >>>> successful! >>>> 07-12 16:44 paramiko.transport DEBUG [chan 1] Max packet in: 34816 bytes >>>> 07-12 16:44 paramiko.transport DEBUG Debug msg: Forced command. >>>> 07-12 16:44 paramiko.transport DEBUG Debug msg: Port forwarding >>>> disabled. >>>> 07-12 16:44 paramiko.transport DEBUG Debug msg: X11 forwarding disabled. >>>> 07-12 16:44 paramiko.transport DEBUG Debug msg: Agent forwarding >>>> disabled. >>>> 07-12 16:44 paramiko.transport DEBUG Debug msg: Pty allocation disabled. >>>> 07-12 16:44 paramiko.transport DEBUG [chan 1] Max packet out: 32768 >>>> bytes >>>> 07-12 16:44 paramiko.transport INFO Secsh channel 1 opened. >>>> 07-12 16:44 root DEBUG !!! Using PosixHandler >>>> 07-12 16:44 root DEBUG !!! Opening shell >>>> 07-12 16:44 paramiko.transport DEBUG [chan 1] EOF sent (1) >>>> >>>> /var/log/httpd/error_log isn't any more informative. >>>> >>>> I'm missing something, can someone point me in the right direction please? >>>> >>>> Thanks - Guy >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>>> --- >>>> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >>>> --- >>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "reviewboard" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> -- >>> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>> --- >>> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >>> --- >>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "reviewboard" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> -- >> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >> --- >> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >> --- >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "reviewboard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
