xiaom...@cloudera.com has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/13049 )

Change subject: IMPALA-8149 : Add support for alter_database events
......................................................................


Patch Set 5:

(8 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/13049/4/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/CatalogServiceCatalog.java
File fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/CatalogServiceCatalog.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/13049/4/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/CatalogServiceCatalog.java@757
PS4, Line 757:    * If tblName is null, removes version number from database.
> We can say:
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/13049/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/events/MetastoreEvents.java
File fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/events/MetastoreEvents.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/13049/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/events/MetastoreEvents.java@445
PS1, Line 445: otected static Stri
> We can just leave it for now. Removing the check is wrong if params can be
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/13049/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/CatalogOpExecutor.java
File fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/CatalogOpExecutor.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/13049/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/CatalogOpExecutor.java@3805
PS1, Line 3805:     if (db == null) {
> I think removing is fine. Probably we can change the Preconditions.checkSta
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/13049/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/CatalogOpExecutor.java@3812
PS1, Line 3812:       default:
> Moved it under set_owner which lock db first.
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/13049/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/CatalogOpExecutor.java@3813
PS1, Line 3813:         throw new UnsupportedOperationException(
> I copied the format in alterTable method which update catalogServiceIdentif
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/13049/4/fe/src/test/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/events/MetastoreEventsProcessorTest.java
File 
fe/src/test/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/events/MetastoreEventsProcessorTest.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/13049/4/fe/src/test/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/events/MetastoreEventsProcessorTest.java@343
PS4, Line 343: est
> nit: fix indentation
I was using clang tool do formatting, I guess it takes each argument as indent 
4, the inside argument break indented 4 more spaces on original.
>From Google: "two continuation lines use the same indentation level if and 
>only if they begin with syntactically parallel elements."
So I think it make sense to indent this way.
What do you think?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/13049/4/fe/src/test/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/events/MetastoreEventsProcessorTest.java@345
PS4, Line 345:     eventsProcessor_.processEvents();
> I feel we should add an additional test, here we are testing if the Notific
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/13049/4/fe/src/test/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/events/MetastoreEventsProcessorTest.java@1481
PS4, Line 1481:         }
> Can we check if possible that the counter MetastoreEventsProcessor.EVENTS_S
Done



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/13049
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iaf020e85cae04163bf32e31363eb4119d624640b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 13049
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: Anonymous Coward <xiaom...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anonymous Coward <xiaom...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anurag Mantripragada <anu...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bharath Krishna <bhar...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bharath Vissapragada <bhara...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Fredy Wijaya <fwij...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <impala-public-jenk...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Vihang Karajgaonkar <vih...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:47:44 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to