David Ribeiro Alves has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: KUDU-1880 Prevent eager ignoring of NULLs
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(3 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/6029/4/src/kudu/cfile/binary_dict_block.h
File src/kudu/cfile/binary_dict_block.h:

PS4, Line 135: virtual
no need for "virtual" if you add "override"


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/6029/4/src/kudu/cfile/binary_plain_block.h
File src/kudu/cfile/binary_plain_block.h:

PS4, Line 105: virtual
same


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/6029/4/src/kudu/tablet/tablet-scan-correctness-test.cc
File src/kudu/tablet/tablet-scan-correctness-test.cc:

PS4, Line 400: INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(TabletScanCorrectnessTest, 
TabletFloatCorrectnessTest,
             :                         ::testing::Values(PLAIN_ENCODING, 
BIT_SHUFFLE));
             : INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(TabletScanCorrectnessTest, 
TabletInt32CorrectnessTest,
             :                         ::testing::Values(PLAIN_ENCODING, 
BIT_SHUFFLE, RLE));
             : INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(TabletScanCorrectnessTest, 
TabletInt64CorrectnessTest,
             :                         ::testing::Values(PLAIN_ENCODING, 
BIT_SHUFFLE));
I commented the same in the other patch, but none of these encodings actually 
exercise the decoder-level eval path, right? is this being tested somewhere 
else?


-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/6029
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib418a4fcc2794ce2f686e864f51834fb4fb8b048
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Andrew Wong <aw...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Andrew Wong <aw...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Burkert <danburk...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: David Ribeiro Alves <dral...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcry...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins
Gerrit-Reviewer: Todd Lipcon <t...@apache.org>
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to