-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36847/#review94040
-----------------------------------------------------------



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/http.hpp (line 747)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36847/#comment148544>

    This comment does not match the function signature.



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/http.hpp (line 763)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36847/#comment148545>

    s/pid/upid



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/http.hpp (line 764)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36847/#comment148546>

    Please explain what happens if it is none.



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/http.hpp (line 765)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36847/#comment148547>

    s/header/headers



3rdparty/libprocess/src/http.cpp (line 938)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36847/#comment148548>

    Because of this concatenation we should explain at the function delcaration 
in http.hpp that it is expected that `path` starts with "/".
    
    Or is it not?


- Bernd Mathiske


On Aug. 3, 2015, 11:45 a.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36847/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 3, 2015, 11:45 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov and Bernd Mathiske.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3152
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3152
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> see summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/http.hpp 
> b8d930058aa3ae9d21ae0f7b420d49f2448f84b1 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/http.cpp 4dcbd74b894b483c4d166c23fac55ac8dba75166 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/http_tests.cpp 
> ecbcbd552ac834659860627c82628ed38e6139b3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36847/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joerg Schad
> 
>

Reply via email to