> On Aug. 13, 2015, 4:56 p.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> > I wonder if we should add a test for this so that we can assert that the 
> > fix works ?
> > 
> > One easy way I can think about it, looking at the tests in 
> > process_tests.cpp ( you should be able to use the already existing 
> > HttpEndpointProcess there ),  set up a route for a mock handler. Send in a 
> > http::Request to this mock route endpoint with URL(http://TEST_URL) , the 
> > handler on the server side should check the host header to be TEST_URL in 
> > the http::Request ?

We have many HTTP(S)  tests already in place. Those tests validate this change. 
 Any test that uses URL for a GET request validates this change. There are a 
few simple HTTPs tests for get and also the new docker provisioner tests 
validate it.


- Jojy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37426/#review95281
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 13, 2015, 12:46 a.m., Jojy Varghese wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/37426/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 13, 2015, 12:46 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3251
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3251
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Currently libprocess http API sets the "Host" header field from the peer 
> socket
> address (IP:port). The problem is that socket address might not be right HTTP
> server and might be just a proxy.
>   Changed the logic to look for http server URL's domain first to populate the
> "Host" field.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/http.cpp 4dcbd74b894b483c4d166c23fac55ac8dba75166 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37426/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jojy Varghese
> 
>

Reply via email to