> On Sept. 21, 2015, 11:09 p.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/backends/bind.cpp, line 194
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38584/diff/1/?file=1079553#file1079553line194>
> >
> >     Why only when errno == EBUSY?

Because other errors are not masked by the backend and propagted uptowards and 
will be reflected in other metrics.

It's no big deal and we'll likely deprecated these some time later. 

Currently we need these to see how often we get errors due to race condition 
between containers cleaning up their mount table and the host destroying these 
folders.


- Jiang Yan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38584/#review99930
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 21, 2015, 5:58 p.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38584/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 21, 2015, 5:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu, Jojy Varghese, and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3466
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3466
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added a few filesystem isolation and provisioning metrics.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/filesystem/linux.hpp 
> 041af7b51cc7da933a929d3beb05c419321ddd73 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/filesystem/linux.cpp 
> e821b27d5cba324e434132d884d25a526c11a9c5 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/backends/bind.cpp 
> d853b49891360fbc2eb46f2e7859fa296fd36beb 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/provisioner.cpp 
> 213f8a6cbcfa198920dbb83c42e58e8aef6d6946 
>   src/tests/containerizer/filesystem_isolator_tests.cpp 
> e2eb049ae477578caeedaa4251f7ddf9028d3fb5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38584/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiang Yan Xu
> 
>

Reply via email to