> On Sept. 21, 2015, 11:22 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/store.cpp, line 256
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38137/diff/9/?file=1078275#file1078275line256>
> >
> >     According to your current design, Store is supposed to be agnostic to 
> > which puller is being used, right? Therefore, there should be local puller 
> > specific code in Store.
> >     
> >     Shouldn't the puller interface returns a map: imageId -> 
> > path_to_fs_layer and the Store just looks at the paths and move them to 
> > getImageLayerRootfsPath?
> 
> Timothy Chen wrote:
>     I thought about this, but I also want to know the dependencies among 
> layers. So decided that the simplest is to return the vector of layer IDs, 
> but just expect the layers to be prepared under the staging directory with 
> the right structure. I've commented on that in the puller interface.

Have you looked at LinkedHashMap?


- Jie


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38137/#review99772
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 22, 2015, 8:22 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38137/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 22, 2015, 8:22 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu, Jojy Varghese, Till Toenshoff, and Jiang 
> Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Joining all the commits around provisioner and local store into one review so 
> it's easier to review, as patches
> are changing code on top of each other.
> 
> All the commits are going to committed together.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am e224060 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/local_puller.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/local_puller.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/message.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/message.proto PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/metadata_manager.hpp 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/metadata_manager.cpp 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/paths.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/paths.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/puller.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/puller.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/store.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/store.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/store.cpp 35d1199 
>   src/slave/flags.hpp e31a418 
>   src/slave/flags.cpp add4196 
>   src/tests/containerizer/provisioner_docker_tests.cpp 1b0c304 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38137/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Timothy Chen
> 
>

Reply via email to