-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39531/#review104965
-----------------------------------------------------------



docs/networking-for-mesos-managed-containers.md (lines 276 - 278)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39531/#comment163319>

    We'll need to update this comment after https://reviews.apache.org/r/39866/ 
has been merged.


- Kapil Arya


On Oct. 23, 2015, 3:21 p.m., Connor Doyle wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39531/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 23, 2015, 3:21 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Kapil Arya.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3788
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3788
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> In Mesos 0.25.0, a new message called NetworkInfo was introduced.  This 
> message allows framework authors to communicate with network isolation 
> modules via a first-class message type to request IP addresses and network 
> group isolation policies.
> 
> Unfortunately, the structure is somewhat confusing to both framework authors 
> and module implementors.
> 
> 1) It's unclear how IP addresses map to virtual interfaces inside the 
> container.
> 2) It's difficult for application developers to understand the final policy 
> when multiple IP addresses can be assigned with differing isolation policies.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/networking-for-mesos-managed-containers.md 33568a8 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 9400434 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto 8131778 
>   src/common/http.hpp 0cc98a8 
>   src/common/http.cpp f56d8a1 
>   src/docker/executor.cpp 1e49013 
>   src/examples/test_hook_module.cpp 43d6cb9 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp e9f2d1b 
>   src/tests/common/http_tests.cpp c2e7704 
>   src/tests/hook_tests.cpp 5a5d019 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39531/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make && make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Connor Doyle
> 
>

Reply via email to