> On Dec. 4, 2015, 1:15 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
> > Hi Haosdent!
> > 
> > I apologize the tardy reply. The patch looks good but needs rebasing.
> > Also, have you thought of a way to test this?
> > 
> > With a test (maybe by just ensuring the existing ordering of the test 
> > modules are indeed run in order), we should be able to land this. Kapil, 
> > any concerns on this?
> 
> Guangya Liu wrote:
>     @nnielsen, does this test help? Thanks! 
> https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/linkedhashmap_tests.cpp#L93-L106

That should be fine - rebase and let's get it in. (Kapil, any objections?)


- Niklas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40056/#review109028
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 8, 2015, 4:58 a.m., haosdent huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/40056/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 8, 2015, 4:58 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Kapil Arya, and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3485
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3485
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Make hook execution order deterministic.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/hook/manager.cpp d9e660a3b6f6d13d9f6b59f53bfc8a4f65af6df4 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40056/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> haosdent huang
> 
>

Reply via email to