----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39456/#review110340 -----------------------------------------------------------
docs/containerizer-internals.md (lines 6 - 10) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39456/#comment170152> Does this still needed? As this was already mentioned in https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/docs/containerizer.md#mesos-containerizer docs/containerizer-internals.md (line 10) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39456/#comment170150> s/eg/eg, docs/containerizer-internals.md (lines 15 - 23) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39456/#comment170163> What about moveing this after ### Type of containerizers docs/containerizer-internals.md (line 18) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39456/#comment170153> s/eg./eg, docs/containerizer-internals.md (lines 21 - 23) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39456/#comment170154> Just a kind reminder, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1718 is planning to move get exeucutor info from slave to master, after this is fixed, it will be master who will generate an executor. - Guangya Liu On Dec. 14, 2015, 8:37 p.m., Jojy Varghese wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/39456/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dec. 14, 2015, 8:37 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Timothy Chen. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Documentation: added containerizer internals > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/containerizer-internals.md PRE-CREATION > docs/home.md a01612ec8347eb8a7a9277b829365b6c3a1fe9e3 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39456/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Jojy Varghese > >
