-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42587/#review117230
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.hpp (lines 137 - 139)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42587/#comment178453>

    Hum, having two data fields here looks a little confusing to me. How about 
just merging them:
    
    ```
    // A map for used handles: primary -> bitset for secondary.
    hashmap<uint16_t, bitset<0xffff>> used;
    ```



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.cpp (line 53)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42587/#comment178358>

    Please insert a blank line above.



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.cpp (lines 53 - 62)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42587/#comment178433>

    This is a simple 'contains' check. For readability, I would rather inline 
this instead of creating a helper method.



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.cpp (lines 73 - 78)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42587/#comment178432>

    I got confused here. minor is a uint16 value. Why this check is necessary?



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.cpp (lines 82 - 96)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42587/#comment178456>

    For testin, I would probably just expose a 'isUsed' method:
    ```
    bool isUsed(const NetClsHandle& handle);
    ```



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.cpp (lines 102 - 105)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42587/#comment178434>

    See my comments above. I would rather have the 'contains' check here.



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.cpp (line 113)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42587/#comment178455>

    why minorHandle -1 here?



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.cpp (lines 114 - 116)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42587/#comment178454>

    Fix error message here (indentation and '+')



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.cpp (line 154)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42587/#comment178458>

    I would simply start from position 0 and find the first unset bit. We won't 
have a lot of containers (O(100) as most). So I won't be too worried about the 
performance here. Add a TODO to do it more efficiently should be sufficient.


- Jie Yu


On Jan. 31, 2016, 5:56 p.m., Avinash sridharan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42587/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 31, 2016, 5:56 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4345
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4345
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Implemented the `NetClsHandleMgr` class.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.hpp 
> b4bc52114389d1c1efce2830f4292bd89bb0de7c 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.cpp 
> ddc1bf0939e5e8995e6f34fe7b8509b51704f63e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42587/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Avinash sridharan
> 
>

Reply via email to