-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43036/#review117449
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp (lines 840 - 841)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43036/#comment178631>

    Does this compile? Should that be:
    ```
    ContainerConfig::Docker* docker = containerConfig.mutable_docker();
    docker->mutable_manifest()->CopyFrom(
        provisionInfo->dockerManifest.get());
    ```



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/docker/runtime.cpp (lines 78 - 79)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43036/#comment178632>

    No need for this.



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/docker/runtime.cpp (lines 81 - 83)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43036/#comment178633>

    I would move this up as the first check so that you don't have to do 
`executorInfo.has_container()` in later checks


- Jie Yu


On Feb. 2, 2016, 5:18 p.m., Gilbert Song wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43036/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 2, 2016, 5:18 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Artem Harutyunyan, Jie Yu, and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4517
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4517
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Plugged in docker runtime isolator.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> 4b504dbb58823ce7675f1d2048dcc7a27c05663d 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/docker/runtime.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43036/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check (ubuntu14.04 + clang-3.6)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gilbert Song
> 
>

Reply via email to