----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43819/#review120091 -----------------------------------------------------------
docs/app-framework-development-guide.md (line 17) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/43819/#comment181463> s/interface/interfaces docs/app-framework-development-guide.md (line 129) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/43819/#comment181467> Why not merge this and above `Scheduler API` into one section? docs/app-framework-development-guide.md (line 131) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/43819/#comment181469> s/Interface/Interfaces docs/app-framework-development-guide.md (lines 168 - 172) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/43819/#comment181466> Do we need to mention this here? The API was not implemented by the built-in allocator, so the framework cannot leverage this if using built-in allocator. - Guangya Liu On 二月 22, 2016, 3 a.m., Joerg Schad wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/43819/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 二月 22, 2016, 3 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Adam B and Neil Conway. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added Scheduler-Driver API to app-framework-development-guide.md. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/app-framework-development-guide.md > e0f40adacf96bdf0c510b3400eb0ed0cd964ab9d > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43819/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Viewed via gist (https://gist.github.com/joerg84/b4bf279a55e1b62051e6) and > via docker website container. > > > Thanks, > > Joerg Schad > >
