-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43960/#review120565
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/tests/containerizer/provisioner_docker_tests.cpp (line 360)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43960/#comment182033>

    Would it add value if we assert that the store does not currently have the 
image?
    
    Also, have assertions around the image being placed in the right dircetory?



src/tests/containerizer/provisioner_docker_tests.cpp (line 365)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43960/#comment182032>

    Would it make sense to name these as per their semantics? `status1` does 
not say a lot about them.


- Jojy Varghese


On Feb. 24, 2016, 6:51 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43960/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 24, 2016, 6:51 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, Jojy Varghese, and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added an end-to-end test for docker registry puller.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/containerizer/provisioner_docker_tests.cpp 
> b3c6f8848f2ceb2bd4dce35d6e7f813c2d4d2bd9 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43960/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to