-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44322/#review122700
-----------------------------------------------------------



Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [44322, 44320, 44319, 44318]

Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 44319

Error:
2016-03-09 09:12:56 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/44319/diff/raw/ 
[28866/28866] -> "44319.patch" [1]
error: patch failed: src/authorizer/local/authorizer.hpp:71
error: src/authorizer/local/authorizer.hpp: patch does not apply

Full log: https://builds.apache.org/job/mesos-reviewbot/11909/console

- Mesos ReviewBot


On March 9, 2016, 5:07 a.m., Alexander Rojas wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44322/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 9, 2016, 5:07 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Joerg Schad, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2950
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2950
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> **WIP: Do not commit**
> 
> Implements the later [Generic Authorizer Interface v 
> 0.3.1](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-XARWJFUq0r_TgRHz_472NvLZNjbqE4G8c2JL44OSMQ)
> proposal.
> 
> It still lacks some parts:
> 
> - [ ] Doxygen in the interface.
> - [ ] Updating `authorizer.md`
> 
> Still the basic functionality is there and I don't expect it to change
> much. As I mentioned, comments aren't there yet but feel free to point
> where they are missed, at this point focusing in the actual content
> may not be relevant as the patch may change from its current form.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.hpp 
> ec6c9928c55c3096c7de634f900419abbdd00886 
>   include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.proto PRE-CREATION 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt 8f57a5701073bf1eaaa223383e928cf5db8f8ae4 
>   src/Makefile.am a41e95ddeb838fdebf4ced953c4a29181916e261 
>   src/authorizer/authorizer.cpp 54278b022118c40d3b976794fd472ce8d8b6a5e2 
>   src/authorizer/local/authorizer.hpp 
> 96baf77709cf721caf46b6c2c096a843c1b5d9c0 
>   src/authorizer/local/authorizer.cpp 
> 4e5c2c2869823ec957735cebfc80dc850d40f9eb 
>   src/master/http.cpp a3ad57a1c3f8a01aa609b28c12825670bb243387 
>   src/master/master.cpp 57ff4a39039f573b8586bc03f873f97826b97f6f 
>   src/master/quota_handler.cpp a41c91f10bc0eedc754425b4de1b3e184c4ffb08 
>   src/tests/authorization_tests.cpp 2b2297036550412a955ff479f6ec9d7dad8cb0e3 
>   src/tests/master_authorization_tests.cpp 
> 29c89fb11da792c3e71eb880a19657ea225b3cc8 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp 9c62833e0a64cfd62fce8cffd04f9cdd933646c8 
>   src/tests/mesos.cpp 395b23d32b2d03aef446858e197cb9788644eefa 
>   src/tests/reconciliation_tests.cpp 97112c4d64c75a16fdd7bbefd517a039fbf55b64 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44322/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make -j4 check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rojas
> 
>

Reply via email to