-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44622/#review123179
-----------------------------------------------------------



Can we introduce the protobuf before the `prepare` method patch?


src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/spec.proto (line 77)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/44622/#comment185360>

    Can we insert an optional `name` field here to keep track of the `Network` 
this result is for? This should not break the JSON schema.


- Avinash sridharan


On March 10, 2016, 3:29 p.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44622/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 10, 2016, 3:29 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Avinash sridharan, Gilbert Song, and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4759
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4759
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Introduced a protobuf message "NetworkResult".
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/spec.proto PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44622/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qian Zhang
> 
>

Reply via email to