> On March 21, 2016, 2:21 a.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/cni/spec.proto, line 17
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/44622/diff/4/?file=1302264#file1302264line17>
> >
> >     Can we put this under cni::spec namespace instead?
> 
> Qian Zhang wrote:
>     Jie, did you mean putting it under mesos.internal.slave.cni.spec or under 
> cni.spec? If what you mean is the latter, then I think we may also move this 
> `spec.proto` file to another place, e.g., under `include/mesos/cni`, just 
> like what we did for the spec.proto of Docker and Appc. Agree? :-)

sorry, i meant the former (under meaos.internal.slave)


- Jie


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44622/#review124484
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 17, 2016, 10:06 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44622/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 17, 2016, 10:06 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Avinash sridharan, Gilbert Song, and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4759
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4759
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Introduced a protobuf message "NetworkResult".
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/cni/spec.proto PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44622/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qian Zhang
> 
>

Reply via email to