----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49571/#review144702 -----------------------------------------------------------
Bad patch! Reviews applied: [49571, 45967, 45966, 45964, 45963, 45962, 45961, 45960, 50205, 48616, 45959] Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 45962 Error: 2016-08-04 01:43:44 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/45962/diff/raw/ [21270/21270] -> "45962.patch" [1] error: patch failed: src/Makefile.am:2254 error: src/Makefile.am: patch does not apply Full log: https://builds.apache.org/job/mesos-reviewbot/14628/console - Mesos ReviewBot On July 30, 2016, 7:09 a.m., Anindya Sinha wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/49571/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 30, 2016, 7:09 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Jiang Yan Xu. > > > Bugs: MESOS-5771 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5771 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Allocations test has the following configurations: > (1) REGULAR: Offers from every slave have regular resources. > (2) SHARED: Offers from every slave include a shared resource. > (3) REGULAR: Offers from every alternate slave contain only regular > resources; and offers from every other alternate slave contains > a shared resource. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp > e5576023e4aab930f0e2b1d82d8baa6569d852eb > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49571/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > All tests passed. > > Allocations benchmark test results > ================================== > Support of shared resources has a small impact on runtime performance in > allocations. Also, there is no visible impact in performance when shared > resources are added in the tests. > > With the patch (and no shared resources) > ---------------------------------------- > round 0 allocate took 3.3096secs to make 2000 offers > round 50 allocate took 3.302636secs to make 2000 offers > round 100 allocate took 3.321002secs to make 2000 offers > round 150 allocate took 3.305755secs to make 2000 offers > round 199 allocate took 3.305825secs to make 2000 offers > > With the patch (and shared resources on all agents) > --------------------------------------------------- > round 0 allocate took 3.361138secs to make 2000 offers > round 50 allocate took 3.375249secs to make 2000 offers > round 100 allocate took 3.36454secs to make 2000 offers > round 150 allocate took 3.366206secs to make 2000 offers > round 199 allocate took 3.365199secs to make 2000 offers > > With the patch (and shared resources on alternate agents) > --------------------------------------------------------- > round 0 allocate took 3.335685secs to make 2000 offers > round 50 allocate took 3.341063secs to make 2000 offers > round 100 allocate took 3.341839secs to make 2000 offers > round 150 allocate took 3.335622secs to make 2000 offers > round 199 allocate took 3.337968secs to make 2000 offers > > Based on HEAD, with all regular resources (no shared resources in HEAD > supported) > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > round 0 allocate took 3.00921secs to make 2000 offers > round 50 allocate took 3.006498secs to make 2000 offers > round 100 allocate took 3.004949secs to make 2000 offers > round 150 allocate took 3.00702secs to make 2000 offers > round 199 allocate took 3.00633secs to make 2000 offers > > > Thanks, > > Anindya Sinha > >