> On Sept. 25, 2016, 10:27 a.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.hpp, line 340
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/51668/diff/3/?file=1509664#file1509664line340>
> >
> >     Should we change 'containers' to 'children'? You can do that in a 
> > followup patch.

Thought 'children' more appropriate previously. I will post a followup patch. 
Thanks!


- Gilbert


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51668/#review150340
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 24, 2016, 11:50 a.m., Gilbert Song wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51668/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 24, 2016, 11:50 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Artem Harutyunyan, Jie Yu, Joseph 
> Wu, and Kevin Klues.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> To support nested containers, each container should maintain a list
> of its children containers in structure. The tree-like structure is
> not necessary though. We just need to keep a flat hashset for nested
> containers.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.hpp 
> 16f9e3e92e90fe7f8a0ebd24e567800e1f285bc9 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51668/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gilbert Song
> 
>

Reply via email to