> On Nov. 4, 2016, 2:41 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > src/tests/containerizer/docker_volume_isolator_tests.cpp, lines 36-37
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/diff/1/?file=1553266#file1553266line36>
> >
> >     I am unsure what style is preferred here. We could (a) order header 
> > groups by directory depth (that's e.g., the reason 
> > `slave/containerizer/mesos/linux_launcher.hpp` is on l.29, not below l.36, 
> > or (b) keep related headers together. I can see both patterns in the code 
> > base. Maybe you have an idea.
> 
> Neil Conway wrote:
>     I'd prefer the former (sort by directory depth, then lexicographically).
> 
> Benjamin Bannier wrote:
>     In that case you should move `#include 
> "slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/filesystem/linux.hpp"` just below 
> `#include "slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/docker/runtime.hpp"` (with a 
> newline).

Sorry: I meant something like:

```
#include "a.hpp"
#include "b.hpp"

#include "a/c.hpp"
#include "a/d.hpp"

#include "a/c/e.hpp"

#include "a/d/f.hpp"
```


- Neil


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/#review154904
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 4, 2016, 3:15 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 4, 2016, 3:15 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fixed header include order.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/containerizer/docker_volume_isolator_tests.cpp 
> ca7bffd3b1773a11a4679d114885d3edd977b02b 
>   src/tests/containerizer/mesos_containerizer_tests.cpp 
> 4df537747d84daa68c29e2d05b22fa386a4a16db 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to