> On 一月 30, 2017, 1:46 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> > src/slave/slave.cpp, line 5244
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/55971/diff/2/?file=1617172#file1617172line5244>
> >
> >     How about include `resources` in the log message?
> 
> Benjamin Mahler wrote:
>     Hm.. I'm having a hard time seeing how that would be helpful here, any 
> thoughts?

My intention is having `resources` in the log so that we can know which 
resources do not allocation info in this framework.


- Guangya


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55971/#review163428
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 一月 27, 2017, 12:27 a.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/55971/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 一月 27, 2017, 12:27 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Jay Guo, Guangya Liu, and Michael 
> Park.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6964
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6964
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> With the addition of MULTI_ROLE support, the agent needs to ensure
> that allocated resources reported to the master have the
> `Resource.AllocationInfo` set. The approach taken here is to set
> it only in memory upon recovering tasks and executors. Note that
> once we allow a framework to modify its roles, we need to update
> the agent to re-persist the resources with injected allocation
> info (rather than just setting it in memory).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/resource_estimators/fixed.cpp 
> 2c1268c3423091c6a419020a3af97255de55db0a 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 0548b04073c0ba4adfc4433d75fd18c2ba79d891 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55971/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> The tests pass at the end of this review chain.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to