-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56619/#review165838
-----------------------------------------------------------



I personally find this patch way too big, so at the end I found myself just 
going through the changeset, perhaps breaking it into the _master_, _agent_ and 
_files_ components will help reviewers. What do you think?


src/files/files.hpp (line 89)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56619/#comment237673>

    Could you indent this more... or less... not sure how, but it is hard to 
tell wether `authorized` is part of the type declaration or the name of the 
parameter.



src/files/files.cpp (line 188)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56619/#comment237684>

    Same here, it is not clear that `authorizations` is not part of type. 
Although this is what clang format returns I think either:
    
    ```c++
    hashmap<
          string,
          lambda::function<Future<bool>(const Option<AuthenticationContext>&)>>
              authorizations;
    ```
    
    or
    
    ```c++
    hashmap<
          string,
          lambda::function<Future<bool>(const Option<AuthenticationContext>&)>
        > authorizations;
    ```
    
    are more readable.



src/master/http.cpp (line 520)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56619/#comment237685>

    Any readon why `validation::master::call::validate(...)` cannot take the 
whole context as parameter?



src/master/http.cpp (lines 655 - 657)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56619/#comment237686>

    Note to self: This may be a bug that violates the semantics of `Subject`, 
write a test.



src/master/http.cpp (lines 795 - 797)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56619/#comment237687>

    This appears here, there and everywhere, that I'm considering it may be a 
good idea to abstract it to something like:
    
    ```
    static Option<string> AuthenticationContext::extractPrincipal(const 
Option<AuthenticationContext>& context);
    ```
    
    That will make it easier if one day we need to modify how the extraction 
works.



src/master/http.cpp (lines 1477 - 1479)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56619/#comment237689>

    likewise, this looks like a prime candidate to be abstracted away.



src/master/weights_handler.cpp (line 52)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56619/#comment237692>

    Not sure if using `using` here is the way to go, we don't seem to use it 
for `http::Request`. This goes with my idea of just using 
`http::authentication::Context` as the name type.


- Alexander Rojas


On Feb. 14, 2017, 1:14 a.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56619/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 14, 2017, 1:14 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Alexander Rojas, Jan Schlicht, Till 
> Toenshoff, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7003
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7003
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch updates the HTTP endpoint handlers in Mesos
> to accept an `AuthenticationContext` instead of an
> `Option<string>& principal`.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/files/files.hpp 8cffc26fc7d674187e55663f23f1e10bed40229e 
>   src/files/files.cpp 8327f8002fbfa3be77a4bbe4aa83a73d0f170f7a 
>   src/master/http.cpp c5324abc0db82275fd65d3f7d361ad8ee9e017d1 
>   src/master/master.hpp 764adb18ddf09b62529c5c96f8e4dfaf7803483e 
>   src/master/master.cpp dff320acd1a13995d51cc0c303edea0cdfaa336d 
>   src/master/quota_handler.cpp 3ad28e4a9363a877d0610b529a6c17fb30ece37a 
>   src/master/registrar.cpp d7134eea34102ab7b24d2f0131363bdd9005cfd3 
>   src/master/weights_handler.cpp da0b995e1866e7eb57b8ef885864c6c6d66405d6 
>   src/slave/http.cpp ccd489d700a605dc41037e00dbd6a7cb3b6edcc6 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 3b0aea4e3e9a17501077beccbccaab4abbe11af2 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp ebba8e16bc9ec45781183e78cb5a3c351a5f65f5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56619/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Testing information can be found at the end of this review chain.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>

Reply via email to