> On Feb. 14, 2017, 5:46 p.m., Gastón Kleiman wrote:
> > src/checks/checker.cpp, line 219
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56208/diff/5/?file=1628427#file1628427line219>
> >
> >     I think that it'd be useful to log the `taskId` here, since an executor 
> > might have multiple checkers running at the same time.
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
>     To do this we have to cache `taskId` in the class. Is it worth it?

As per offline discussion, I think that we could move this logging statement to 
`CheckerProcess::finalize()`.

I see the following benefits:

 1. It makes the debugging output friendlier =).
 2. `CheckerProcess::initialize()` already logs the check configuration, so 
logging something on termination would be symmetrical.
 3. It makes `Checker` a plain and simple wrapper, except maybe for the extra 
validation in `Checker::create()`.


- Gastón


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56208/#review165521
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 28, 2017, 11:12 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56208/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 28, 2017, 11:12 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gastón Kleiman and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6906
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6906
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add support for general checks, i.e. defined by CheckInfo, in
> checking library. A general check can be either an command or
> an HTTP request. The library performs the requested check at
> the specified interval and sends the result to the framework
> via a task status update. If the current result is the same as
> the previous result, no status update is sent.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/checks/checker.hpp dc293f3d3613dec716510d269829f8a6f406c277 
>   src/checks/checker.cpp 8716e4cc684e6c4b6b76d8ca53221be06d10b2a6 
>   src/checks/health_checker.hpp f1f2834b3429fb00cc49c179fa9a3de328f597b5 
>   src/checks/health_checker.cpp a5225ff1f4b071ed4182d41fa8ecc705fa4dbe00 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56208/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/56218/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>

Reply via email to