> On May 2, 2017, 12:13 a.m., Michael Park wrote:
> > src/master/http.cpp
> > Lines 4884-4889 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/58587/diff/1/?file=1704585#file1704585line4884>
> >
> >     I'm not quite following this example. Specifically, I don't get what "a 
> > persistent volume can be destroyed if it is not allocated" means..
> 
> Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
>     Ok I guess I shoud say "a persistent volume can be destroyed only if it 
> is not used". In this case, it's not going to be pending offers so you would 
> unncessarily rescind all offers.
> 
> Michael Park wrote:
>     Hm... it seems like this should be mitigated by
>     ```cpp
>         // If rescinding the offer would not contribute to satisfying
>         // the required resources, skip it.
>         Resources recovered = offer->resources();
>         recovered.unallocate();
>     
>         if (required == required - recovered) {
>           continue;
>         }
>     ```
>     Is this not true?

Hm you are right. I'll drop this comment and leave just the one above. I'll 
send another rr for caveats about shared persistent volumes, which is different.


- Jiang Yan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58587/#review173561
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 1, 2017, 2:29 p.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58587/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 1, 2017, 2:29 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anindya Sinha and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Seems like the comments about "virtually always win the race against
> 'allocate'" could be made more precise in helping people understand
> how it works.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/http.cpp 5aae52870451d883ef1ea1fda5a27764d7f318e8 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58587/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> N/A
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiang Yan Xu
> 
>

Reply via email to