> On May 31, 2017, 12:09 a.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
> > Lines 2387 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59320/diff/2/?file=1721803#file1721803line2387>
> >
> >     Hm.. why disabled on windows? Do you know why or is this just copied? 
> > For example, it's not clear to me why the above partition test isn't 
> > disabled but the below one is.

I don't really have a way to run tests on Windows, and I'm nervous just 
depending on the Windows reviewbot/CI. I'll try enabling it and see what 
happens...


- Neil


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59320/#review176399
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 16, 2017, 8:19 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59320/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 16, 2017, 8:19 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add an explanatory comment and a test case for a particular case in the
> master's logic for handling agent re-registration.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.cpp 4e7a161f431624bd78d3e9032eb8587687149cad 
>   src/tests/partition_tests.cpp 4ff428564d1fa6cb96e6f8ec8edc331da88a3eb6 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59320/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> Checked that if you add `CHECK_NOTNULL(framework)` to the master code (circa 
> the newly added comment), the incorrect `CHECK` is triggered by this test 
> case (but not by any existing test cases).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to