> On June 9, 2017, 6:48 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > src/tests/upgrade_tests.cpp
> > Lines 562-576 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59860/diff/1/?file=1743640#file1743640line562>
> >
> >     This needs to come before you start the slave, no?

Doesn't seem like it's possible? The `slave` variable is the result of 
`StartSlave`.
I copied this pattern from the `UpgradeSlaveIntoMultiRole` test.


> On June 9, 2017, 6:48 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > src/tests/upgrade_tests.cpp
> > Lines 703-717 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59860/diff/1/?file=1743640#file1743640line703>
> >
> >     It would be nice to put these above the starting of the slave, see my 
> > previous comment about being able to avoid the need to advance the clock.

Doesn't seem like it's possible? The `slave` variable is the result of 
`StartSlave`.
I copied this pattern from the `UpgradeSlaveIntoMultiRole` test.


- Michael


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59860/#review177534
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 13, 2017, 1:22 a.m., Michael Park wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59860/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 13, 2017, 1:22 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Neil Conway.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7633
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7633
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Prevent allocating non-capable agents' resources to hierarchical roles.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> 73d0b42433a1ff3e853e851b8191864b4e233666 
>   src/tests/upgrade_tests.cpp b07426fa1e402c88a8a647eafdb77f6ebadd9959 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59860/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> New tests + `make check`.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michael Park
> 
>

Reply via email to