-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61798/#review183462
-----------------------------------------------------------




3rdparty/stout/include/stout/exit.hpp
Lines 42 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/61798/#comment259475>

    Shouldn't we use `CRLF` on Windows?



3rdparty/stout/include/stout/exit.hpp
Lines 76 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/61798/#comment259476>

    Why don't you choose `stdout` vs. `stderr` based on `status` value similar 
to `__Exit`?


- Alexander Rukletsov


On Aug. 21, 2017, 8:54 p.m., Andrei Budnik wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/61798/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 21, 2017, 8:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Benjamin Bannier, Benjamin 
> Mahler, and James Peach.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7791
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7791
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> EXIT macro can't be used when async-signal safety is required.
> 
> Currently, ABORT is used for terminating a program after both
> unexpected and expected errors, when async-signal safety is required.
> In case of expected errors, `abort` causes coredumps, which might be
> undesirable.
> 
> In addition, _EXIT takes variable number of arguments, thereby _EXIT
> interface doesn't force users to concatenate strings, thus making its
> usage more async-signal safe.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/exit.hpp 
> e5c2d3440a85ab2d2cae551ee4094cd965e38dfc 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61798/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check (mac os x, fedora 25)
> internal CI
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrei Budnik
> 
>

Reply via email to