-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62252/#review185261
-----------------------------------------------------------



Thanks for taking this on Chun! A few high level comments to start.

(1) I don't think we need to implement a version of `execute()` that takes 
arguments that we'll apply to the function. With lambda captures we can easily 
and cleanly accomplish that and any of the corner cases will be cleanly solved 
for with C++14 which we should move too sooner rather than later. If folks 
really want that functionality I'd rather just see them use `std::bind()` and 
do `executor.execute(std::bind(f, arg1, arg2))`. It's not that many more 
characters and it greately simplifies your implementation!

(2) Given the simplification of (1) I feel like you probably don't need a 
separate `Executor::Process` class, and instead can just use `dispatch()` on 
the existing `process`. You should be able to simplify your SFINAE by 
leveraging the return type `dispatch()` since it already takes care of the 
`void` issue for you.

- Benjamin Hindman


On Sept. 12, 2017, 8:12 p.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/62252/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 12, 2017, 8:12 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7970
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7970
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch adds a convenient interface to `process::Executor` to
> asynchronously execute arbitrary functions.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/executor.hpp 
> cd2f2f03cba8a435f142b31def9f89a6cd61af73 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/process_tests.cpp 
> 82efb2f8449e4cb13620cae1a49321fc42e2db60 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62252/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chun-Hung Hsiao
> 
>

Reply via email to