-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63997/#review191947
-----------------------------------------------------------




include/mesos/allocator/allocator.hpp
Lines 220 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63997/#comment269896>

    Hm.. why is this called out? I don't think a caller could depend on this 
for correctness, so it seems better not to put this in the interface 
documentation?



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp
Lines 689-718 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63997/#comment269897>

    Is this copied from elsewhere? If so, can you guys think about how to pull 
it out like we did for `updateSlaveTotal`? Is this `trackAllocatedResources`?


- Benjamin Mahler


On Nov. 27, 2017, 2:55 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63997/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 27, 2017, 2:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The added method complements 'Allocator::addSlave'. While in
> 'addSlave' the total agent resources and used resources are passed,
> the method 'addResourceProvider' added here allows to add additional,
> potentially used resources to an existing agent.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/allocator/allocator.hpp 
> ae122003487ca8956573e993cd3993aa8cc286f1 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/allocator.hpp 
> 8fa4fdeec4ec64bcd49fc442c230d8684a11cfd9 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp 
> 2c4832b29842330fa57756cd3d4202f265a820f3 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> 5ce9ceaa3a5f84a1e076d45448863c418531cc2b 
>   src/tests/allocator.hpp 6a84f1beb86dceb5a5e9bf4615c13a216f3d0905 
>   src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp 
> f0f95ba4f667bf8ea54e985d8cde913a4170d8ff 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63997/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to